[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: ports
Ronald G. Minnich wrote: This is what happens when you don't separate xen-users from xen-developers. Having said that, when I was compiling the index of virtualization papers, I could not find papers on the nuances of Xen porting. Perhaps this is not a common research topic in virtualization because other para-virtualization efforts have not attracted as many ports as Xen. An index of Xen porting resources could help future ports. In the absence of papers, are there known mailing list threads or other notes that could be compiled into an index? E.g. a comparison of the Plan 9 and NetBSD ports.On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, maru wrote:(and seriously, who uses Plan 9? yeah, It's got some very cool features, but was it worth porting?)This type of question, appearing on a research list, still amazes me.Yes, the port was worth the effort.ron Rich ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |