[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] unstable binaries
> No. I ran the default testset (ltp-full-20050207) on xen0-2.0.4 and > repeated the failed tests on different kernels (all 2.6.10): > 1.770_FC3 (fedora errata kernel), vanilla, xen0-2.0-testing (2.3.), > xen0-2.0-testing (4.3.). Except the FC3 kernel, they all had the same > config (except options not present due to ARCH). The test "fcntl23" > failed on all kernels, so it probably a fedora issue. The tests > "ioperm02", "iopl02" and "nanosleep02" failed on all xen-kernels, > and only on them. This is the output for "nanosleep02": The iopl02 and ioperm02 failures are expected, but not at all serious. We actually have a plan to virtualize iopl just to tidy this up. nanosleep2 is a surprise -- I can't recall seeing this fail before. I wander if its an Athlon issue... Ian ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |