[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Interrupt forwarding


  • To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:56:08 -0500
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:57:20 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=lM+ATZ6yKdxpa++XD0XEmBzhSfV6FW2FCIyo2Z+MoG/dAyFA+1Ow2AVgWgFTcZhACbguEKYFD4x2ul/R4N3cy9RUGFiEPAfH/FChMgzL/RsHhsYxL6nMOfZlqHIn0ac3KCuW0Mrdp5+skE79WhRl8F/dKiB8peHTlai10gVU2Ik=
  • List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:01:42 +0000, Keir Fraser
<Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 12 Mar 2005, at 20:07, Jon Smirl wrote:
> 
> > [jonsmirl@jonsmirl proc]$ cat interrupts
> >            CPU0       CPU1
> >   0:     484259     448188    IO-APIC-edge  timer
> >   8:          0          0    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
> >   9:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
> >  14:        776        762    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
> >  15:       8040       7726    IO-APIC-edge  ide1
> > 169:      37509          0   IO-APIC-level  libata, uhci_hcd:usb4, eth0
> > 185:          5          0   IO-APIC-level  ehci_hcd:usb1
> > 193:        548        272   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb2,
> > uhci_hcd:usb5
> > 201:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb3
> > 209:          3          0   IO-APIC-level  ohci1394
> > NMI:          0          0
> > LOC:     932357     932306
> > ERR:          0
> > MIS:          0
> 
> Bizarre. Not only routed through an I/O APIC, but the IRQ numbers are
> large enough to probably be MSI vectors. Perhaps the mobo layout has
> legacy PCI slots sharing IRQ lines before reaching MSI logic in the
> chipset? Putting network on the same line as anything else is very
> sucky.  Is this really a server-class board?

It is a Dell Poweredge 400SC server.  I don't like how the net and
SATA drives are on the same IRQ.

I am running the latest linus bk kernel. The IRQ numbering system in
the kernel has been changed. The board is just a standard APIC without
MSI. No PCI Express.

Xen is planned for desktops too, right? Interrupts are shared all of
the time on desktop systems. It is not safe to assume you can get an
exclusive one.


> 
>   -- Keir
> 
> 


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.