Re: [Xen-devel] RE: unstable binaries

[Michael Rice <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 10:59 -0600, Michael Rice wrote:
> > > failed on all kernels, so it probably a fedora issue. The tests 
> > > "ioperm02", "iopl02" and "nanosleep02" failed on all xen-kernels,
> > > and only on them. This is the output for "nanosleep02":

> > nanosleep2 is a surprise -- I can"t recall seeing this fail before. I
> > wander if its an Athlon issue...

> I'm seeing a similar problem on different Hardware and OS.  Sorry 
> in advance about the verbosity of this.  I am looking for an answer
> and a reliably working kernel, so I'm off to try 2.0.5 and more.

2.0.5 exhibited the same problem in my config.

The -unstable as of this morning does not seem to have the problem.
(Have successfully run the unixbench float test several times now
without seeing sleep MAXINT)

Can anyone say for sure where this may have been fixed?  I don't see
anything in the changelogs.  I need to report to my CTO the results of
this benchmark vs VMware ESX.


-- 
Michael Rice                                    mrice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IT Architect                                    512-692-1024
Digital Motorworks                              www.dmotorworks.com



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel