Re: [Xen-devel] Patch [4/4] Debian-2.0.5-1 disable-html-docs.patch

[Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:

> Name: disable-html-docs.patch
> Depends: add-build.patch
> Description: disable html docs, as they use non-free tools.
>  Building the html docs requires latex2html, which is non-free.  Disabling
>  them allows for xen to be uploaded to main.
>  .
>  This is not a big deal, as ps and pdf forms of the documentation are
>  still included.
> Signed-off-by: Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- xen-2.0.5.orig/docs/Makefile
> +++ xen-2.0.5/docs/Makefile
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>  GFX = $(patsubst %.fig, %.eps, $(wildcard figs/*.fig))
>
>  all: build
> -build: ps pdf html
> +build: ps pdf
>       rm -f *.aux *.dvi *.bbl *.blg *.glo *.idx *.ilg *.log *.ind *.toc
>
>  ps: $(DOC_PS)
> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
>       $(INSTALL_DIR) $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
>       cp -dR ps $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
>       cp -dR pdf $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
> -     cp -dR html $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
>
>  pdf/%.pdf: ps/%.ps
>       $(INSTALL_DIR) $(@D)

I see that a variant of this has been applied to 2.0-testing.  Unforunately,
just doing "which latext2html" won't suffice, as the package may actually be
installed, but we can't call it.

I can Build-Conflict with it, which will solve the problem, but then those
people who do like using latex2html will dislike me.

I've been thinking of writing a configure script, and this may be the kindling
that starts the fire.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel