Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)

[Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:18 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> >Note that Pyrex generates some pretty crappy code (to the point that it
> >won't build at all with gcc4).  The dbus guys are seriously considering
> >switching away from pyrex-generated bindings to something hand done.
> >  
> Do you have a suggestion for an alternative?  I know there are a number 
> of binding-generators but I thought Pyrex was the most widely used.

Pyrex is probably the most generally used -- the stuff pygtk uses is
nice, but not very general.

In most cases, though, bindings done by hand end up being higher quality
than something that's just being generated.

Jeremy



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel