[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: iSCSI


  • To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:43:28 -0700
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James Bulpin <James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:43:24 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pTXs5gg18IJ/iJCXcNWOgDPbtIbxIMjSpOoQHWdXInx8mDvbNCDabd42sdAlI+Quzmu3E+HFJzU7ARouCwdepQXihf3skfPWbZEs5NJ/shlCg7mp4xXJY3mMM0cZ0Dq9q+ATmoqxFdOiLsTIj1QSKmXiM12lsYzPsQMOG1QV+ik=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

I've looked at it, but had some issues building it. If the cisco
initiator is going away I'll definitely give it a spin this week.

                            -Kip

On Apr 10, 2005 12:04 PM, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Has anyone got any experience using the new 'open-iscsi' initiator?
> (either on Xen or native) http://www.open-iscsi.org/
> 
> We've been using the cisco iscsi stack
> http://linux-iscsi.sourceforge.net/ for some time, but the performance
> isn't great. open-iscsi claims good performance, so it might be worth
> switching over.
> 
> BTW: gnbd works great, but I wish it used checksums over and above the
> ip csum / ethernet crc32.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ian
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.