Re: [Xen-devel] Badness in local_bh_enable

[Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:19:30PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140  
> > [<c011fb12>] local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90  [<c031fcfd>] 
> > skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2d0  [<c016ac5c>] __pollwait+0x8c/0xd0  
> > [<c0360d3a>] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160  [<c031af49>] 
> > sock_poll+0x29/0x40  [<c016b635>] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0  
> > [<c016b6aa>] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0  [<c016b871>] 
> > sys_poll+0x161/0x240  [<c011f14c>] sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90 
> >  [<c016abd0>] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0  [<c0109758>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 
> This only happened when you had two virtual NICs enabled on a domU,
> right?

No, all the domUs have one nic only.  Each NIC has multiple IP
addresses.

> It's on the list of issues to try and reproduce and investigate when we
> get a chance. Having further reports that the problem goes away with
> just a single NIC would be useful.

Possibly relevant or not - we don't bridge the domUs we route them.

-- 
Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel