[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] explicitly defining memmove for x86_64
I had to comment out xc_ptrace_core.c in tools/libxc/Makefile as well. Thanks for the tip. David On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 15:49 +0000, Rich Persaud wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: "Rich Persaud" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:31:09 > To:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] explicitly defining memmove for x86_64 > > Temporary workaround: comment out xc-ptrace.c in tools/libxc/Makefile. > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 10:04:33 > To:xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] explicitly defining memmove for x86_64 > > I applied this patch, and it went further, but it is failing now with > these errors: > > gcc -DPIC -m64 -Wall -Werror -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing - > I ../../tools/libxutil > -I. -Wp,-MD,.xc_ptrace.opic.d -fPIC -c -o xc_ptrace.opic xc_ptrace.c > In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h:13, > from /usr/include/asm/processor.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/elf.h:10, > from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:4, > from xc_ptrace.c:4: > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/sigcontext.h:9: error: redefinition of `struct > _fpstate' > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/sigcontext.h:23: error: redefinition of `struct > sigconte > xt' > In file included from /usr/include/asm/pda.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/current.h:7, > from /usr/include/asm/current.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h:18, > from /usr/include/asm/processor.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/elf.h:10, > from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:4, > from xc_ptrace.c:4: > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/pda.h:26: error: `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' > undeclared > here (not in a function) > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/pda.h:26: error: requested alignment is not a > constant > In file included from /usr/include/asm/system.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h:19, > from /usr/include/asm/processor.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/elf.h:10, > from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:4, > from xc_ptrace.c:4: > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h: In function `__cmpxchg': > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:249: error: `LOCK_PREFIX' undeclared > (first use > in this function) > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:249: error: (Each undeclared identifier > is repo > rted only once > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:249: error: for each function it > appears in.) > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:249: error: parse error before string > constant > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:255: error: parse error before string > constant > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:261: error: parse error before string > constant > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/system.h:267: error: parse error before string > constant > In file included from /usr/include/asm/processor.h:4, > from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/elf.h:10, > from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:4, > from xc_ptrace.c:4: > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: At top level: > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h:229: error: > `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' unde clared here (not in a > function) > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h:229: error: requested alignment is > not a con stant > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: In function `prefetchw': > /usr/include/asm-x86_64/processor.h:396: error: called object is not a > function > make[4]: *** [xc_ptrace.opic] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable/tools/libxc' > make[3]: *** [build] Error 2 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable/tools/libxc' > make[2]: *** [install] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable/tools' > make[1]: *** [tools] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/xen-unstable' > make: *** [world] Error 2 > bl2-14:/tmp/xen-unstable # > > > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:06 +0000, Scott Parish wrote: > > Without the attached patch ubuntu's gcc (3.3.5) was complaining about > > the implicit declaration of __builtin_memmove. Extern'ing past that, > > the linker wouldn't resolve the same symbol. > > > > This patch just does the same thing that is already done for x86_32. > > > > signed-off-by: scott parish <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > sRp > > > > -- > > Scott Parish > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |