[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] separate domain info and vcpu context
- To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 14:21:04 -0700
- Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sun, 08 May 2005 21:20:40 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HXAF5qA2FjDRN5P6miNQjDPHCU659izsKL8xG+gSnCOf1/EbtGsQlOB6qhOTQlN9r8mwYDwhmoylbBZLosrSDvK+GLF4q2PbThVuWmop2AzuSxBAehLQ8i1uPnXMqkVzt4VQoqhVHbax2pQbiJouusx2dIFSPtquDLytUnr6cwU=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
> GETVCPUCONTEXT?
>
> A more descriptive name and clashes less badly with GETDOMAININFO.
>
Yes, GETVCPUCONTEXT is a more accurate name. That thought was nagging
at me but I wasn't sure it mattered. Change noted.
-Kip
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
