[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen
- To: Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 02:23:39 +0900
- Cc: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:23:05 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bqWr+bI3SGWes4rrTo48vjCFLlZJFEEqCH9Lc2stGHefbUtiQ5bgHFk7SaWiS5qIBcXm8mri5oKptIY12q9MOTOBhv3jNckgzU1TnAjOPRzCBAiV8Fc5vWY4gmoJMSdRzWE5KOaATvBzpNJoNEWLP/56QAq95wOVvAOgxO3Wo6w=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On 5/21/05, Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So far, performance seems comparable.
>
Joshua, as I understand, this project would be a competitor of Xen?
is there any published paper about this project?
thank you,
aq
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
