[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]vbd/vnif paravirtulization driver hypervisorsupport]
> On 5/25/05, Ling, Xiaofeng <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is there any comment for this patch? > > Is it acceptable or not? > > yes, i have the same question. sometimes patches sent to the > list receive no comment. that means they are in queu for > review, and get feedbacks later? or we should re-send the > patches to the list (as in > LKML) ? It's safest to assume that this is a lossy communication channel: If after a few days you haven't heard anything and the patch hasn't been checked in, please send a follow up message. BTW: It's very helpful if the patch contains a good description of what it does and the rational behind the design, either in the changelog or in comments as appropriate. This save a lot of review time. Further it would make our lives a lot easier if people at least checked that patches build and work on both x86 and x86_64. Building with an ia64 cross compiler would be good too, but I must admit that we don't usually do this, though we'll probably have to once ia64 gets a larger user community. Thanks, Ian > i think the policy of accepting patches should be made clear, > and put into the FAQ. that would be appreciated by contributors. > > thank you, > aq > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |