[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] DOM0_GETDOMAININFO intended behavior


  • To: Daniel Stekloff <dsteklof@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:43:44 -0700
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:43:34 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K4FNjoxpdvmv1BaukOoR336fZ3hd9eCJSj/KBvVpKeZlhUCEv8CQrKesffH9YHM70A6wlJsgstBimXFX4mx9BmMp681C27mCOuF9a9uLrBjZ/s9ySBXUtVVjy4VRcd/wDqDIvn+Yl8Rvb7F2ozgEXnsseeJlih/oIflrXboVVts=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

:-) 
I asked the same question a week or two ago and yes it is intended. It
provides for easy iteration. I think it is kind of a hackish interface
as it isn't uniform with *all* the other DOM0 calls. However, it works
and once you know to check the domid return value your code will work
as expected.


                      -Kip

On 6/3/05, Daniel Stekloff <dsteklof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is it intended behavior for DOM0_GETDOMAININFO to return the next
> domain's info if a requested domain doesn't exist?
> 
> In xeno-unstable - xen/common/dom0_ops.c - lines 310-325:
> 
>         for_each_domain ( d )
>         {
>             if ( d->domain_id >= op->u.getdomaininfo.domain )
>                 break;
>         }
> 
>         if ( (d == NULL) || !get_domain(d) )
>         {
>             read_unlock(&domlist_lock);
>             ret = -ESRCH;
>             break;
>         }
> 
>         read_unlock(&domlist_lock);
> 
>         op->u.getdomaininfo.domain = d->domain_id;
> 
> 
> 
> If, as an example, I request info for domain 2 that doesn't exist
> anymore and a higher domain number does exist, xen will return the next
> domain's information rather than an error telling me domain 2 doesn't
> exist.
> 
> Is this correct?
> 
> I noticed that libxc's xc_domain_getinfo() is built to use this when
> grabbing multiple domain information. I want to know if we need to fix
> vm-list to check what's returned or if this is unwanted behavior in the
> library and hypervisor.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.