[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm --version


  • To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:57:57 +0900
  • Cc: Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:57:07 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tvfliOuAalUJhCJd7A2dKSiS9I6OOM2YE04Mi1rVkXa4Y03tZhlP0Y6VtTHv1wIcdXnSc1F8HUrhe+MRXGu1QPnxQ5jwFIRSzu/TiJUpvf+ba+MFJoCox2L1ep4nfCZnTSIrwd5VSs8b1+gHnuNPGsAycO5MV74tIqo7199XgZw=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 6/9/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > can you confirm that ht_per_core is also wrongly set? it is
> > set (=1) at arch/x86/setup.c or arch/ia64/smpboot.c, but
> > never changed. but this variable is used somewhere, and got
> > reported in "xm info", for example.
> >
> > so all of its usage are also wrong when we use HT? (because
> > in that case ht_per_core must be 2)
> 
> OK, that's bad -- the code that initialised ht_per_core has also gone.
> 
> What we need to do is to take the new code from Linux 2.6.12-rc5 that
> understands multicore, and correctly initialise ht_per_core and
> core_per_socket. We can hardwire socket_per_node=1 for the moment.
> 

anybody is working on this? if no, i will take it.

regards,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.