[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Bug in 2.0.6 "buildconfigs" ?
- To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Bill Burns <billburnseh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:19:43 -0400
- Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:18:39 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=PQmdV3d1Z1iFdtd40M41wT+0cvl0NlJod+GUptJMCttiRAEEGp1bMfTO4tK0Ir9Q2CzJ6jPqfTszziF+gGOGbmeIhE6lEZx2l8R8BWOBLxwig88Wf46gWKAgZU4wKYMDQsJ/uI/QAR66C7FUBo3fy31E57q/PfZc2+Lx/STme04=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Looks like this is still broken both in 2.0-testing and the latest
unstable. The mk.linux.2.6-xen0, while it has a nice clean
EXTRAVERSION, sets CONFIG_VERSION from the
EXTRAVERSION in the linux dir Makefile that has the
un-resolved $(XENGUEST) tacked on. Thus putting a
config under dist does not work.
Bill
>On 5/23/05, tdc <tdc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think there is a bug in mk.linux-2.6-* scripts which leads to always
>> using xenX-defconfigs and ignoring configs in dist/install/boot.
>>
>> On line 34 in mk.linux-2.6-* you check for file:
>> $(DESTDIR)/boot/config-$(LINUX_VER)$$CONFIG_VERSION
>> this evals to filename "config-2.6.11.10$
(XENGUEST)", which is obviously
>> wrong.
>
>Yeah, I've fixed this now in 2.0-testing and unstable.
>
> (other stuff deleted here)
>
> christian
_____________
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
