[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm info

  • To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 17:49:29 +0900
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:48:18 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qNv2ySaY5Ajhkk8cMX9Oft2vxglxMuKKNdN8tVT9whYJCHlSZjSMn5Imayi3hWw8SXpnnG29alGHF1TJ2bL0gK2fFOs13dhOodwzOv1UmNMOtaFIoXdFffxcHirujoPGDSO1Oo47O7pEqKHGQuBm03Gj05E6uv6e8QQS7mUysH0=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 7/3/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2005, at 09:35, aq wrote:
> >> Why does the patch hideously reformat xen/common/kernel.c?
> >
> > do you mention the indentation i made for block of code in a switch()?
> Yes: that's the only change you made in the file, except for a one-line
> change for xen_extraversion_t.

i always think that code inside a switch() should be indented. that is
a standard coding style, no?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.