[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Does physdev_dom0_hide work with the unstable builds?



> I assumed you meant Xen0 in domU. That worked. Thanks for the help. :)

Ahhhhh, yes.  You're right of course (although what I actually said was 
strictly correct, it was completely useless ;-))

> Can this tidbit be added to the user docs? I'm sure it would be useful
> to others.

If you get a chance, could you stick it in the Wiki somewhere?  A 
"documentation wishlist" would be a good thing to have on the wiki, anyhow.  
We can then comb through this to update the docs before the next release.

Cheers,
Mark

> On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 01:28 +0100, Mark Williamson wrote:
> > > The physdev_dom0_hide seems to work ok for me on 2.0.6, but I still
> > > haven't gotten a domU kernel to boot with physical access compiled in
> > > yet. Let me know if you figure it out.
> >
> > Try using a Xen0 kernel in the dom0 - that should get you started.  There
> > are no security implications of this.  The only difference is that xen0
> > kernel has more stuff compiled in, so it's bigger.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 15:38 -0700, malahal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > So, how do I use my second Ethernet PCI card directly by a guest OS?
> > > > I am a rookie, would appreciate if someone gives me all the relevant
> > > > instructions.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Malahal.
> > > >
> > > > Ian Pratt [m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> > > > > > I used physdev_dom0_hide='(01:00.0)' but the device still
> > > > > > shows up in the domain0. Is not supposed to work with the
> > > > > > unstable builds?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm afraid this feature is currently unavailable in unstable -- it
> > > > > was broken by the ACPI changes. I hope we can get it back before
> > > > > the final 3.0.0 release, but to my knowledge no-one is currently
> > > > > working on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ian
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am trying to use an Ethernet PCI card directly by a user
> > > > > > domain. What is the easiest way to do that? Thanks in advance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, Malahal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > > > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.