[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] PageReserved ?


  • To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 05:48:39 -0500
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:47:17 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TQsNdBnqxj57I5C+71vGjHWUAUZBPzUOzEub5If+WV0Vy0B5LOH6MQlBdNk0ZDxM/Kc3sEbTBVI9c7YXI/mfXd65ontKJ2B8okFKowht3dtgyEjP0qP8b00fW20e3JHCU1kxaivoa2RdyB79Bdu8Zp5zZzJwGWFu7K/5Anb8buM=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 7/17/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 17 Jul 2005, at 10:49, aq wrote:
> 
> >>> With xxx > 32M, domain always failed to boot.
> >>>
> >>> Any suggestion now?
> >>
> >> It's probably been broken by the 2.6.12 upgrade. I'll look into it.
> >
> > No, this is -testing tree (kernel 2.6.11.12)
> 
> I'd add xprintk's to the domU code (or turn printk into xprintk) and do
> a debug build of Xen. That'll get some early output from domU. Then you
> can work out how far it is getting and ultimately what line of code is
> failing.

ah, this is interesting. i will give it a try. lets see how to do that:

- you suggest adding xprintk to domU code - but exactly which code?
- or better redefine printk to xprintk in linux kernel of domU
(linux-2.6.x-xenU/)
- recompile xenU kernel (no need to recompile Xen and dom0 kernel).

is that correct?

thanks,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.