[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes
> > In fact, are network and block the right nouns? > > Would vblock/vnetif be better? > > It seems to me that network and block are known concepts, and the user is > already in a virtual control environment, so the "virtual" part should be > implied by the fact that you are running xm in the first place. So I would > lean towards network or netif and block directly without the "v". However, > I don't feel all that strongly about it, so whatever you like there is > fine. I'm inclined to agree with you here; as long as we don't ever have xm doing any non-virtual things it should be unambiguous. Even then, we could use a "p" prefix (or similar) to denote physical ops in preference. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |