[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes

To: "Sean Dague" <sean@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:49:07 +0100
Cc: xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:47:32 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcWXZWf8aaR6Bd7AQ22DhboSUJxIxgAC7rKQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes

 
> It isn't in xm info today.  It could be added, or given it's 
> own place. 
> Honestly, it might make sense to make all the sched commands 
> have a sched- prefix, mostly to make it clear to the user 
> what bvt really is.

Yep, having a sched- prefix is definitely helpful.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Console Daemon
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] IPsec broken in 2.6.12-xen0?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-tools] [RFC] xm interface proposed changes
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Console Daemon
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.