[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] code question?
Doing some janitorial (you cleaning the flooded toilets and such) work today. I have come across this line of code that really I'm not sure what the intent was..in xen/include/sched.h #define hypercall_preempt_check() (unlikely( \ softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) | \ (!!current->vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending & \ !current->vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_mask) \ )) the part where we have !!current->vcpu_info_evtchen_upcall pending should this be..should the "!! just be "!"? I think that: !!a & !b === (a != 0 ) && ( b == 0 )It's just more efficient to do it directly using bitwise ops than to use the full logical operators (can gcc really not optimise this sort of thing???). Cheers, Mark And if so shouldn't this just be changed to#define hypercall_preempt_check() (unlikely( \ softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()) | \ (!(current->vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending & \ current->vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_mask)) \ )) In a lot of the code in Xen we are using the "!" operator with bitwise operations..this is one of those examples. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |