[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] New console transport and update xenconsoled.

[Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:01:08PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Why are we listening for virq?  The polling method used before is 
> considerably more robust.  The virq's aren't always delivered on domain 
> destruction (they are only delivered if a domain crashes or is shutdown).

That would be a bug then, when does it happen?

> Moreover, I thought the overriding goal of this was to get rid of xcs?  
> Why are we still using it?

Because we haven't switched virq delivery over to use the store.

> Also, there's a number of errors that this code introduces (changing 
> things to use asprintf and not checking for OOM conditions).  It would 
> have been nice if this went to the list first so we could comment on it.
> I'll submit some cleanup patches later today...

Thanks, looking forward to those patches!

    christian


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel