[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] USB backend and XenBus


  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Mark Ryden <markryde@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:50:58 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:48:45 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rQoCH6YjmfcteTZIv6J0dZ0UnBTtWybZGHXvq6s3pkRDwyEfMUlLKLFCI3cUXXnaS2bTnwRuL3lpjz8LvnBPW6134Pp6hhrU9059HSX8GB9Dqfp96iadyc8rYuyRnYeP8skFzwFVmimHIz3Wgp3tSVgkfOzlYbDmB23bfghjQWc=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hello,

   I wonder why USB backend does not use XenBus. (in xen unstable).
   
   Network  backend and Block backend do use XenBus. 

   And USB backend seems to have much in common with them. (Rings,
event channels,etc).

   Is it a task to be done in the future, or is there some
architectural or other

  reason that  XenBus will not be used by USB backend  at all ? 

  Can someone elaborate on it in 2-3 sentences (or more, if he likes) ? 

   TIA,
       MR

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.