[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:54:18 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:52:14 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KL2Qz1kwYB63GSVMugXdGZbj+UrVGvJa06OczoF/Gq+TtrBOdpZML2Jm9Tvhdw0FPzFUOsv1cuFMLIL9MPbcy5/e+gsi3vWjih2qcEhK5LfzYRQcRfyVVTKJm1KNMmNT3UWS/Mn1yuxgE1Sz9A3faR1A0aYC5+HFWrqiKHvJ9MY=
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 06/10/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > My old 20050929 snapshot works ok. The .config files are identical.
> > > Kernel config attached. Any ideas on what broke?
> >
> > Last nights binary release doesn't have this problem. Is the
> > config file available?
>
> linux-2.6-sparse/arch/xen/configs

Using that config, with 7234. I built a dom0 kernel and the problem is
still present. Weird. What gcc and binutils are you using? I've got
gcc 3.4.4 and binutils-2.15.92.0.2.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums
  - From: Ian Pratt

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] network & block device setup via udev
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] @introduceDomain with xenbus?
Previous by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: bad ip checksums
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.