[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Opteron server and NUMA

To: Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:09:03 +1300
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:06:31 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BBcnDdq7bEo0+PE8Z7/mInkRGoiBLYMalTzICmfsQ97FrKGMczh4utu9gbdDsKDWBdw0/QbgJaqIkSqeFdr7btPuuFQbcASjMugSsW53vzsAJHYX5lM5tTWUpHyd/mqo5JEgfQf8ZVRilF24BrN+2TJ0ZCZ781Gs+fy5fg0V9cU=
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 10/7/05, Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Xen 3.0 on it.  I've found that I can compile SMP just fine, and it sees all
> four processors, but when I add K8 NUMA, the compile breaks.

I just noted this complier breakage as well.

Thinking about it, I expect the nature of Xen makes it tricky to get
going at the moment.

--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Opteron server and NUMA
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- [Xen-devel] Opteron server and NUMA
  - From: Alexander Charbonnet

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] SMP dom0 and AMD64? + some benchmark figures
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: Add NAT scripts to xen/scripts/
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Opteron server and NUMA
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Opteron server and NUMA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.