[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?

  • To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Joakim Dahlstedt" <jda@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:28:36 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:38:10 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcXTDeloWB8wCQO5Rdibj9tz/mgHeQ==
  • Thread-topic: Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?

I have a small question:

There are a couple of lines of the following format in arch-x86_32.h

#define FLAT_RING1_CS 0xe019 /* GDT index 259 */
#define FLAT_RING1_DS 0xe021 /* GDT index 260 */

And the comment just does not make any sense to me. 1c00 or e000 had
made sense. Is this just a stale comment for an earlier version of Xen
that just should be updated or am I missing something fundamental?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.