Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.0 Test CD v1 released

[Matt Ayres <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2005, at 17:33, Matt Ayres wrote:
>
> > Can you comment if the bugs I've reported in bugzilla #'s 402, 405, 
> > and 406 have been fixed/assigned? I tried to change a few of our 
> > (unixshell.com) users over to a 3.0 server and it turned out poorly.  
> > We have serial console (with logging) setup for our servers so when a 
> > system panics or sends an oops so I am more than capable of capturing 
> > it submitting bugs for any troubles, but I received those different 3 
> > panics and the system couldn't stay up for more than a few hours (I 
> > had even tried turning off PAE and SMP support).  This was all using 
> > snapshots from around 11/13.  I know there have been many, many 
> > commits since then.
> 402 and 405 are the same bug. Can you really repro it with a non-PAE 
> kernel? It looks related to using swiotlb to access memory >4GB.
I should have documented this better, I believe due to the panics in 
402/405 I switched to non-PAE, non-SMP dom0 and domU kernels and then 
produced 406.
> If you can repro 406 with a debug build of Xen (debug=y make) then the 
> backtrace will make much more sense.
I can try to do this.  Of course I can't guarantee to get the panic, but 
if I get do see anything I'll make sure the kernels are built with 
debugging enabled.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel