[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] n/w performance degradation


  • To: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Diwaker Gupta <diwaker.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:32:03 -0800
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:32:30 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E4hYxZV1olbZWx8uJUFnA2GLzWjjcuwYsBQUPyPIrWE71X/v0NeHSDei0auBBq+anHVX61NxwB4tjhUeduANzMzLXT+Nm/Nzs+no0JHRxqpF7hN/RLZuhhToNYgrLpoZcaZ8X3YK2ZKw0itBMceMOPCEdWZ/8PkwubHuKAwOki0=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

> Diwaker,
>
> Can you run oprofile and obtain any kind of breakdown
> on that, if possible?

Not today. Unfortunately I'm going to be offline for the next couple
of weeks. Anyhow, I'll try to see if I can post some more data in the
interim.

> Also, are you dedicating individual
> CPUs to dom0 and guest? (Avoiding much of the context
> switching on I/O)

Like I mentioned in my email, everything is on the same CPU right now
(nosmp, noht)

> What are your memory allocations? How much
> of a bump do you get if you increase memory?

Currently, both dom0 and the vm have 128MB. I rebooted with dom0
having 512MB and VM with 256 MB. Here are the numbers:

dom0:
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec    987 MBytes    828 Mbits/sec

VM:
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec    938 MBytes    787 Mbits/sec

So getting slightly better. I haven't run these with SEDF though,
above are using BVT.

--
Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.