[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.0 released!
> I've had 3.0-unstable debs prepared for awhile now; hadn't > uploaded them, for several reasons: > > 1) xen-unstable required a 2.6.12 base kernel; this no longer > exists in > debian, so it wasn't possible for me to build-depend on > it, so I could > create a standard unified-diff. Do you have 2.6.14? You could build based on linux-2.6-xen.hg, but this hasn't has s much testing (we know of at least on issue on x86_64) > 2) vif-route.sh is buggy; it doesn't handle the case where > multiple adapters > exist. So, dom0_ip(and the functions it calls) ends up > returning 2 ip > addresses, which makes ifconfig complain. > > I've got a fix hot-patched on our deployed server, I'll be > sending that > soon. Please post it, thanks. > 3) It appeared that when I tried the final 3.0.0 release, > that xenstored was > very sick. I had a previous(20051116 snapshot) installed, > and the tdb file > was corrupted(sorta). xenstore-list / shows to local > paths, but no vm nor > tools. Removing the file 'fixed' this. I'm not certain > exactly what > happend, tho. It's possible that the install scripts should delete the database when performing an upgrade. I don't think there have been any format changes in a while, though. > 5) I see it's not possible to have both a xen microkernel > that supports both > pae and non-pae. For individuals who are compiling > themselves, that's > fine; they can select which they want. Yep, no real way round that. Most users are already trained to this thanks to it being a compile time option in Linux. > Also, what other options are available, that would require multiple > compiles? Also, I don't see a concise list of what config > options I can > tweak for xen itself; the documentation is a bit poor in > that regard(pae > isn't even mentioned in the documentation; you have to > read a separate > README). Having a debug/verbose build of xen is sometimes handy for debugging things, but since debug builds are deliberatly combatitive its probably not a good idea for production. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |