[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Uses of &frame_table[xfn]
> > On a related note, I'm not clear on the relationship between > > the "memory" variable in xmdefconfig and the two reservation > > variables needed for ballooning (not sure what they are named, > > but call them max_reservation and initial_reservation). Which > > of these latter correspond to "memory" in xmdefconfig and how > > does the other get determined? > > For unprivileged guests, Xend sets both the maximum and > current reservation to > the configured "memory" value, when a domain is created. > Subsequent calls to > xm mem-set set the current reservation, and leave the maximum > alone. Calls to > xm mem-max set the maximum (and reducing the maximum without > thought is a good > way to crash your guest). > > For dom0, the initial values are set from the kernel command > line, and the > current reservation is altered if memory is needed for domain > creation, > migration, etc. Thanks for the reply. This is starting to make sense. With the balloon driver still unimplemented, I have seen messages (from xend?) that /proc/xen/balloon can't be opened. This occurs when I try to create a domain such that the sum of memory of all launched domains (including dom0) exceeds the total machine memory on the machine. So when I get this message, is xend trying to balloon memory from dom0? Or is this the point where xend(?) tries to do the xm mem-set to balloon some memory away from a domU (and, if so, how does it decide which one(s) to steal memory from)? Thanks, Dan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |