[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:50:02 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:54:46 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

What, if any, is the reason for x86-64 xenlinux to have a different
__PAGE_OFFSET value than native? While merging, it would seem reasonable
to drop this difference if not motivated technically.

Thanks, Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- [Xen-merge] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] asm/page.h inconsistencies?
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] asm/page.h inconsistencies?
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] asm/page.h inconsistencies?
Next by thread: [Xen-merge] Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64's __PAGE_OFFSET
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.