[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] VP problematic for backend drivers on IA64?

To: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:55:05 +0200
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, okrieg@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:02:38 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Dan,

I understand that during the IA64 session at the summit there was some
discussion on VP being problematic for the current backend drivers (or
the other way around), and IOMMUs were suggested as a possible
solution. Could you please elaborate on what's the problem?

Thanks,
Muli
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] VP problematic for backend drivers on IA64?
  - From: Gerd Hoffmann

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] VMX status report changset 8631:8a3549172896
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Support for AGP aperture as IOMMU in AMD64 mode [2/2]
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] VMX status report changset 8631:8a3549172896
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] VP problematic for backend drivers on IA64?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.