Re: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process

[Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Jun,

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:42:48AM -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> I think it would be better if we incorporate them one by one, not them
> together on the _same_ day (I doubt you are doing that, though), because
> we can debug effectively focusing on fewer problems. For example,
> 1. hvm, 2. sanity testing (a day or two), 3. 2.6.15 or 2.6.16-rcX
> 
> This way we can get more hvm people focusing on 2.6.15 or 2.6.16-rcX.

Makes sense.

> Having the best possible vendor releases will definitely make our life
> easier. I think we should go with 2.6.16-rc1. 

To nobody's surprise, I like this as well.

> > Any reason not to call 3.0.1 now? There are a load of bug fixes and
> > improvements over 3.0.0.
> > 
> I think it's a good idea to release 3.0.1 at this point. 

And so do I.

Best,
-- 
Kurt Garloff, Head Architect, Director SUSE Labs (act.), Novell Inc.

Attachment: pgp6Gt5PRSqDU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel