[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 02/15/2006 03:42:00 AM: > >>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> 14.02.06 19:25:19 >>> > >xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/14/2006 11:37:45 AM: > > > >> While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to > >> del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't been > >> deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, > >> 0)). Is this intentional? If so, how is this supposed > >> to work? > > > >This has most likely been introduced during the recent merging with newer > >kernel trees. > > But this doesn't tell me if the current code is correct or has to be > regarded broken (as I suspect)... It can be regarded as broken. Thanks for finding this and I will post a patch later. Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |