[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:18:41 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dan Hecht <dhecht@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:19:11 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Keir Fraser wrote:

> I don't understand the last paragraph here. It's not true that, for example,
>  available_time = real_time - stolen_time
> right?

I think that is true.  Not sure why it wouldn't be...

-- 
All Rights Reversed

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting
  - From: Dan Hecht
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] cleanup p2m functions
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] cpu steal accounting for kernel (i386)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.