[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal

Rik van Riel wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote:

There is a Signed-off-by line on every patch I send out,

You're right.  It was just the first 1/24 that was missing it,
it was there in the second copy.

BTW, I have no idea why the first 1/24 was missing it. I checked right before sending, and it was there - perhaps I forgot to save my changes. The second copy turned out fine, but didn't make it to LKML. Everyone cc'd directly got it, but the LKML filter has a ban on the word propasition, and being blackholed by it, I merely assumed the patch was too large - so I split it up, and actually ended up binary searching down to the problematic section before finding the taboo list.

_Every_  problem eventually turns into a binary search.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.