[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal

[Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>   
> > There is a Signed-off-by line on every patch I send out,
> >     
> You're right.  It was just the first 1/24 that was missing it,
> it was there in the second copy.
>   
BTW, I have no idea why the first 1/24 was missing it.  I checked right 
before sending, and it was there - perhaps I forgot to save my changes.  
The second copy turned out fine, but didn't make it to LKML.  Everyone 
cc'd directly got it, but the LKML filter has a ban on the word 
propasition, and being blackholed by it, I merely assumed the patch was 
too large - so I split it up, and actually ended up binary searching 
down to the problematic section before finding the taboo list.
_Every_  problem eventually turns into a binary search.

Zach

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel