[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2006-03-22 at 18:09 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > An IBM hypervisor on ppc64 communicates uses SCSI RPC messages.  I think 
> > this would be quite nice for Xen, because SCSI (a) is a message-based 
> > model, and (b) implementing block using SCSI has a very high Just 
> > Works(tm) value which cannot be ignored.  And perhaps (c) SCSI target 
> > code already exists, so implementing the server side doesn't require 
> > starting from scratch, but rather simply connecting the Legos.
> A pure SCSI abstraction doesn't allow for shared head scheduling which
> you will need to scale Xen sanely on typical PC boxes.
Not true at all.  If you can do it with a block device, you can do it 
with a SCSI block device.
In fact, SCSI should make a few things easier, because the notion of 
host+bus topology is already present, and notion of messaging is already 
present, so you don't have to recreate that in a Xen block device 
infrastructure.

> SCSI emulations
> are also always full of bits people got wrong, often critical bits like
> tagged queues and error sequences - things that break your journalled
> file system.
This I'll grant you.

        Jeff




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel