Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] This patch fixes several issues related to vmxassist

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1 Apr 2006, at 11:35, Li, Xin B wrote:

> Keir, do you think this one seems better?
> When in real mode, we should always calculate address as ((seg & 
> 0xFFFF)
> << 4) + off, big real mode obey the same rule.
> When in real mode to protected mode transition, only the IP address
> calculation should use real mode addressing.
Yes, I'll push this one: I like the extra sanity checking. Why are the 
checks for zero and greater-than-gdt-limit required (why is it 
insufficient to merely check the current mode)?
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel