Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] If the 'cdrom=' option is specified in the definition file but media is

["Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > > From: Ross Maxfield <rmaxfiel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  
> > Doesn't this need a Signed-off-by: Ross Maxfield <rmaxfiel@xxxxxxxxxx>?
> People have been complaining that a patch should not retain the Signed-off-by
> line if the patch has been modified, because they do not sign-off the modified
> patch.  If a patch needs minor changes before it can be committed, we can
> either bounce it back to the author, which seems unnecessarily heavyweight, or
> do what Keir's done here, and sign-off the patch himself.  The From: line
> retains the audit trail, credit, and copyright, and it's clear that Keir
> himself thinks that this patch is acceptable.
This is not acceptable practice in my opinion. An alternative would be 
to add an Acked-by: Ross line to verify that the code is still ok'd per 
the DCO guidelines by the original author.
What would be even better is to follow the accepted practice for linux 
development, which is to bounce it back to the author with comments. In 
fact, please explain why we don't follow that practice again? If the 
answer is that it is too heavyweight please think again.
Mike Day

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel