[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Signed-off-by again

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:39:59 +0300
Cc: Ross Maxfield <rmaxfiel@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>, mdday@xxxxxxxxxx, Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:41:13 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:59:50PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:

> My preferance would be to authorize maintainers to make 'simple'
> modifications to patches before checkin as a single changset. Anything
> more 'semantic' should be a second changest.

Sounds great to me, and fits in with Linux's usage of the DCO.

Cheers,
Muli
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Signed-off-by again
  - From: Ian Pratt

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] pciback: update documentation for new functionality
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
Previous by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Signed-off-by again
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] Xm-test fails to pass sanity checks in hvm mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.