[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Regarding page table management changes from Xen v1to Xen v2 (and v3)
On 26 Apr 2006, at 19:15, Anthony Liguori wrote: No, these singleton updates on the Linux demand fault path are issued with the update_va_mapping hypercall. This is possible because the virtual address that the pte maps is known, so its possible for Xen to use a linear pagetable to do the update rather than creating an on-demand mapping to the domain's pagetable page. This is an important optimization on 32b where Xen address space is tight.Just to make sure I understand, we do the linear mapping for performance (so we don't have to keep remapping) but not necessarily to save VA space since the linear mapping uses a fixed amount of space.Is there any reason that we would strictly require a linear mapping (other than it being convenient)? On 64b we could use the 1:1 mapping of all physmem that Xen has. Obviously that is infeasible on 32b. In fact the interface (passing a virtual address) pretty much means we have to use a linear mapping in both cases. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |