[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support

  • To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>, "Chris Wright" <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:45:45 +0300
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:54:01 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Ies4Rv1ibdYsAtB2N18JsPChoFLKYXFogfVCUtzK0uOrl8nNcTT14RaZVo24tr+gI0HHgH+o+Kwrp6lg+45TIbkgUJmFAKeqXfFqJgXWRkC4xVr2MV09o5O6h9NwfSGMYAgW3CMEdtJxB/1ON8Isgt+GlliiUHWPrCiXSdKRepg=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > It's also wrong.  There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just
> > grab this namespace.  make it xen_ or xenhv_.
>
> You should reject the recent "hypervisor file system" with the same
> argument then.


On 5/9/06, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I prefer it would become lparfs or something like that indeed.


AFAIK it's called s390-hypfs now.

                                     Pekka

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.