[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lower bound on domX-min-mem


  • To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 20:09:12 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:09:38 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcZ1334D/PWMLxEnRrGOdH/nD6vVhgE+GsLg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lower bound on domX-min-mem

I sent this patch in last week. It has not made it into the tree nor
have I heard any feedback about it.  Is there anything wrong with the
patch?

The reason for the patch is described in this discussion:
http://www.nabble.com/xm-mem-set-issues-t1603450.html#a4347490

Thanks,
Aravindh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:17 PM
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Keir Fraser
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lower bound on
domX-min-
> mem
> 
> This patch causes "xm mem-set" to be lower bound on domX-min-mem
option
> in xend-config. Another configuration option called domU-min-mem has
> been introduced, which works similarly to dom0-min-mem. This is
prevents
> users from freezing the system when doing "xm mem-set" on very low
> values like 32M.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil
> <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.