[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] /sys/hypervisor/uuid
- To: "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "B Thomas" <bjthomas3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:06:53 -0400
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:07:17 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=I/WrnPM2w9FTQ4HcGv1UtIDNKxL5e2OGr85ppSsru7ZsARiwA/0OHF7reQwmhWhNv+LOLNO7kOsmAB8RzRNdjNM6eVSrSNwerenWFmYYhMllmgEZDhX3InyEL7/61fxKdKAIb7J0aiww376szAy5Wtrbo4WXnj8Qvl9MLvCPRQU=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Sigh - yeah, I'm pretty focused on fully-virtualized domains. Too
bad, it's an interesting approach. Sorry for the diversion.
-b
On 5/19/06, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 09:43 -0400, B Thomas wrote:
> If UUID is a desirable domU accessible item, perhaps consideration
> should go towards placing it into the domU SMBIOS tables that are
> being proposed currently on this list. The DMI system structure has a
> 16 byte UUID field. It feels like a natural place to put this type of
> information.
While this is possible for fully virt guests, it's not doable in the
context of paravirtualized guests as there isn't any BIOS memory space
to put SMBIOS tables into
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
