Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem

["Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Kier,

The  floor was chosen because we found the system to be unreliable
below that value (in the tests we did on sles 10). A floor I think is
useful to have even if the value picked is a different one.

K. Y
>>> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:34 pm, in message
<3fff45e9026898258afc2445c25d85c9@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser
<Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

> On 22 May 2006, at 17:31, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
> 
>> Will this patch be acceptable if the floor is removed and
>> xen_start_info- >nr_pages is used instead of max_pfn?
> 
> The 192000 floor is just a bit bizarre. I wouldn't be sorry to lose 
> that. But max_pfn is the right thing to use, not  - >nr_pages, I
think.
> 
>   --  Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel