[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86 linux: prevent halted VCPUs from eating up CPU bandwidth
>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 30.05.06 10:49 >>> > >On 30 May 2006, at 09:11, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Indeed, this was the behavior I intended, but somehow I failed to find >> the VCPUOP_down operation that I was looking >> for. Here's an updated patch. > >Given that you went for the more complicated definition of halt() that >calls block when event delivery is enabled, is it actually necessary to >not compile the halt-checking routine? If event delivery is enabled in What halt-checking routine do you mean here? >that function, shouldn't we return from each invocation of halt() on >(at least) each timer interrupt? If not, I wonder why our behaviour >there differs from native? Yes, I think the net effect should be similar behavior to native. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |