[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] UNTESTED backport rcu_needs_cpu and call it from stop_hz_timer UNTESTED
Harry Butterworth wrote: THIS PATCH FOR REVIEW ONLY IT'S UNTESTED!!!!!! Ill test on Monday if no-one has done it by then. There is a problem with the current implementation of stop_hz_timer in arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c where the hz timer can be stopped on a CPU which has RCU callbacks pending. This patch backports a new RCU API created to fix this problem for the s390 implementation of stop_hz_timer and also updates the time-xen.c implementation of stop_hz_timer to call the new API. Signed-off-by: Harry Butterworth <butterwo@xxxxxxxxxx>------------------------------------------------------------------------diff -r 8c64169a05d3 -r 8ef455f268b3 linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c --- a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c Thu Jun 8 08:52:04 2006 +++ b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/time-xen.c Fri Jun 9 19:47:18 2006 @@ -978,12 +978,19 @@ unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); unsigned long j;- /* We must do this /before/ checking rcu_pending(). */cpu_set(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask); + + /* See matching smp_mb in rcu_start_batch in rcupdate.c. These mbs */ + /* ensure that if __rcu_pending (nested in rcu_needs_cpu) fetches a */ + /* value of rcp->cur that matches rdp->quiescbatch and allows us to */ + /* stop the hz timer then the cpumasks created for subsequent values */ + /* of cur in rcu_start_batch are guaranteed to pick up the updated */ + /* nohz_cpu_mask and so will not depend on this cpu. */ + smp_mb();/* Leave ourselves in 'tick mode' if rcu or softirq pending. */- if (rcu_pending(cpu) || local_softirq_pending()) { + if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || local_softirq_pending()) { cpu_clear(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask); j = jiffies + 1; } else { diff -r 8c64169a05d3 -r 8ef455f268b3 patches/linux-2.6.16.13/rcu_needs_cpu.patch --- /dev/null Thu Jun 8 08:52:04 2006 +++ b/patches/linux-2.6.16.13/rcu_needs_cpu.patch Fri Jun 9 19:47:18 2006 @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +--- ../pristine-linux-2.6.16.13/kernel/rcupdate.c 2006-05-02 22:38:44.000000000 +0100 ++++ ./kernel/rcupdate.c 2006-06-09 20:27:45.000000000 +0100 +@@ -485,6 +485,20 @@ int rcu_pending(int cpu) + __rcu_pending(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu)); + }+ ++/*++ * Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done ++ * by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning ++ * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not- ++ * an exported member of the RCU API. ++ */ ++int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu) ++{ ++ struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu); ++ struct rcu_data *rdp_bh = &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu); ++ ++ return (!!rdp->curlist || !!rdp_bh->curlist || rcu_pending(cpu)); ++} ++ + void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user) + {+ if (user || +--- ../pristine-linux-2.6.16.13/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2006-05-02 22:38:44.000000000 +0100++++ ./include/linux/rcupdate.h 2006-06-09 20:28:57.000000000 +0100+@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static inline void rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(int + } + + extern int rcu_pending(int cpu);++extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);+ + /**+ * rcu_read_lock - mark the beginning of an RCU read-side critical section.------------------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel Harry,I am doing some quick testing of your patch. So far, the results are consistent with the mainline testing results. -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |