[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] Supported #of CPUs/VMs per CPUs

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "whit" <whitson22@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:23:14 -0400
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:23:53 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcbbHTqUeWusiUcQEduuJgAX8io7RQAD5T7Q
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Supported #of CPUs/VMs per CPUs

> No, I meant that for an SMP guest, the maximum number of virtual CPUs
it
> can
> appear to have is 16 (not 32 as I suggested in my first email).
> 

I am a little confused here. Isn't MAX_VIRT_CPUS set at 32? I have been
able to bring up a 32-way x86_64 DomUs in the past. Has something
changed recently?

Aravindh Puthiyaparambil
Xen Development Team
Unisys

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Supported #of CPUs/VMs per CPUs
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Supported #of CPUs/VMs per CPUs
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] enable port accesses with (almost) full register context
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Handling Key Sequence
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Supported #of CPUs/VMs per CPUs
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Supported #of CPUs/VMs per CPUs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.