[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] qemu-dm performance
I've been investigating why qemu-dm is causing %CPU to be high when viewing fully vitalized guests with vncviewer( about 20% usage ). I've looked at the code, and one area that I'm curious about is the vram_dirty() function in tools/ioemu/hw/vga.c. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but vram_dirty() seems to be using SSE inline functions to optimize it's bit-shifting/masking/loading/storing/comparison operations to see if dirty bits need to be set for a page within the shadow table. Also, I used gdb to make sure that I'm really executing the SSE optimized version of vram_dirty() that utilizes xmm0 registers. So out of curiosity, I decided to comment out calls to vram_dirty() from vga_draw_graphic() and the guests still behave normally, but CPU% now drops to 8%. I know this is silly, and that I should expect a CPU drop for commenting out code, but why is vram_dirty() adding 12% CPU utilization when it can be commented out without crashing my viewer, and without me even noticing a difference in the guests behavior? Can someone help me to understand the purpose vram_dirty serves and perhaps why it seems 2 be so CPU intensive without really changing the way my virtual guest behaves? Also, where else should I look in the code for possible explanations to why qemu-dm uses 20% CPU simply to view a guest. All comments and suggestions regarding this matter are appreciated, thx, T. McAfee Xen Testing _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |