[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] add timeouts to mini-os



Which functionalities would you like to see that are currently missing?

The timers I was thinking about would follow Xen/Linux model. For each timer you would need to specify the following:
- a timeout (timestamp)
- a handler function
- if the timer is one-shot or periodic

Such timers are more flexible, but the handler function is limited in functionality by the fact that you are running in the interrupt context. Since Mini-OS doesn't maintain much state (that could be modified by a timeout timer), the only thing you would be likely doing is waking up a thread/set of threads. It therefore follows that your implementation does the same thing, but it's shorter/cleaner. In particular there is no need for timer heap or a similar datastructure.


(There are few shortcomings of my implementation that I'm well aware of myself. For instance, I think it would be more efficient to unlink blocked threads from the ready queue and keep the ones with pending timeouts in a "timeout" queue, sorted by ascending expiry date. That way, it wouldn't be necessary to walk the entire ready queue all the time to see if any timeouts have expired: it would suffice to just look at the head of the timeout queue.
However, my goal was to keep things simple and to not change more than
absolutely necessary.)

That's fine. I decided against separate lists for runnable/blocked threads for exactly the same reasons. Mini-OS is not about scalability, keeping the things as simple as possible is the main priority.

Cheers
Gregor

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.